Advanced search

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : GPU grid??! Which GPU is supported?

Author Message
chungenhung
Send message
Joined: 28 Dec 07
Posts: 16
Credit: 2,967,892
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwat
Message 1124 - Posted: 28 May 2008 | 19:38:19 UTC

I saw \"GPU Grid - PS3 Grid\" in BOINC project list.
I thought PS3 Grid is only crunching on PS3. Does it support GPU now??
If so, which GPU(s) are currently supported?

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1127 - Posted: 29 May 2008 | 13:14:05 UTC - in response to Message 1124.

I saw \"GPU Grid - PS3 Grid\" in BOINC project list.
I thought PS3 Grid is only crunching on PS3. Does it support GPU now??
If so, which GPU(s) are currently supported?


We will support NVIDIA GPUs, but we cannot say more now.

g

Westsail and *Pyxey*
Send message
Joined: 12 Feb 08
Posts: 11
Credit: 3,194,461
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwatwat
Message 1154 - Posted: 19 Jun 2008 | 23:42:49 UTC - in response to Message 1127.

I saw \"GPU Grid - PS3 Grid\" in BOINC project list.
I thought PS3 Grid is only crunching on PS3. Does it support GPU now??
If so, which GPU(s) are currently supported?


We will support NVIDIA GPUs, but we cannot say more now.

g

WOOT! Please keep us updated. Got a whole bunch of NVIDIA cards here just itching to crunch. :D
____________

Profile [FVG] bax
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 18 Jun 08
Posts: 29
Credit: 17,772,874
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1188 - Posted: 2 Jul 2008 | 18:20:20 UTC

news ?

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1210 - Posted: 15 Jul 2008 | 0:27:28 UTC - in response to Message 1188.
Last modified: 15 Jul 2008 | 0:28:12 UTC

news ?


For Linux64:
1) Install the latest Nvidia driver from http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_get.html
2) Download this BOINC client
http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl/boinc_ubuntu_6.3.5_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.sh
3) Attach to ps3grid.net

NVIDIA GPU supported:
http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_learn_products.html

GDF

Temujin
Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 07
Posts: 100
Credit: 21,848,502
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1211 - Posted: 15 Jul 2008 | 12:43:17 UTC - in response to Message 1210.
Last modified: 15 Jul 2008 | 12:51:39 UTC

all in and working, test underway

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1212 - Posted: 15 Jul 2008 | 12:51:44 UTC - in response to Message 1211.

Hi

Great news, however, I get the following messages when I "Update" PS3Grid


Tue 15 Jul 2008 13:24:02 BST||Can't load library libcudart
Tue 15 Jul 2008 13:24:02 BST||No coprocessors
...
...
Tue 15 Jul 2008 13:28:04 BST|PS3GRID|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 611161 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
Tue 15 Jul 2008 13:28:09 BST|PS3GRID|Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
Tue 15 Jul 2008 13:28:09 BST|PS3GRID|Message from server: No work sent
Tue 15 Jul 2008 13:28:09 BST|PS3GRID|Message from server: Full-atom molecular dynamics for Cell processor is not available for your type of computer.
Tue 15 Jul 2008 13:28:09 BST|PS3GRID|Message from server: Full-atom molecular dynamics is not available for your type of computer.


I'm running 64bit Fedora 7 and have an NVidia 8800GS (shows in supported hardware list).
I've installed the latest cuda drivers as above (NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-169.09-pkg2.run) and the "special" version of boinc

any ideas?



Hi,
do you have a file called libcudart64.so in your BOINC dir?

thanks, gdf

Temujin
Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 07
Posts: 100
Credit: 21,848,502
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1213 - Posted: 15 Jul 2008 | 12:55:59 UTC - in response to Message 1212.

do you have a file called libcudart64.so in your BOINC dir?

You're too quick :D

You're quite right, I failed to copy libcudart64.so into my boinc folder but realised after I posted.
Its up & running now, I'll post an update when I have some results.

Nice work

chungenhung
Send message
Joined: 28 Dec 07
Posts: 16
Credit: 2,967,892
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwat
Message 1214 - Posted: 15 Jul 2008 | 15:26:16 UTC

What about Windows support?
I am not a linux person and don't even know how to setup boinc in linux

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1215 - Posted: 15 Jul 2008 | 17:33:10 UTC - in response to Message 1214.

What about Windows support?
I am not a linux person and don't even know how to setup boinc in linux


We will support Windows but I don't know when. It could be in month or later.

gdf

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1217 - Posted: 15 Jul 2008 | 22:56:55 UTC - in response to Message 1215.
Last modified: 15 Jul 2008 | 23:03:37 UTC

There are 7 users with failed workunits at startup.
It would be very useful to know what they are running (OS, GPU, driver version) in order to understand the problem.

REMEMBER THAT YOU NEED TO UPDATE THE BOINC CLIENT (6.3.5 ubuntu) FROM THE LINK THAT I HAVE GIVEN ABOVE. YOU CANNOT USE AN OLD ONE.

Many many thanks.

gdf

Profile [XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ
Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 08
Posts: 60
Credit: 108,384
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
wat
Message 1218 - Posted: 15 Jul 2008 | 23:06:37 UTC
Last modified: 15 Jul 2008 | 23:10:51 UTC

Hi,

Thanks for the GPU application, i've been waiting this since a long time :)

I've got one wu in error, my system is ubuntu hardy (2.6.24.19) , forceware 177.13 and 9600GT with no oc at this time

edit: Boinc 6.3.5 of your link ;)

ZeuZ @ L'Alliance Francophone

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1219 - Posted: 15 Jul 2008 | 23:22:19 UTC - in response to Message 1218.

Hi,

Thanks for the GPU application, i've been waiting this since a long time :)

I've got one wu in error, my system is ubuntu hardy (2.6.24.19) , forceware 177.13 and 9600GT with no oc at this time

edit: Boinc 6.3.5 of your link ;)

ZeuZ @ L'Alliance Francophone


Hi,
I have sent you a private message asking for info on your machine.

gdf

Profile [XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ
Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 08
Posts: 60
Credit: 108,384
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
wat
Message 1220 - Posted: 15 Jul 2008 | 23:44:03 UTC

Answered

ZeuZ @ L'alliance Francophone

Temujin
Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 07
Posts: 100
Credit: 21,848,502
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1222 - Posted: 16 Jul 2008 | 7:05:59 UTC

Hi

My 1st GPU work unit completed just fine, the next 2 failed and the 4th is running now.
Also had a machine crash just after the 1st WU completed.
Results here

Profile [XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ
Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 08
Posts: 60
Credit: 108,384
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
wat
Message 1223 - Posted: 16 Jul 2008 | 7:38:23 UTC - in response to Message 1222.


Results here


Hello,

Can you tell us which GPU and drive you use for comparison?

Thanks

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1225 - Posted: 16 Jul 2008 | 7:56:18 UTC - in response to Message 1223.


Results here


Hello,

Can you tell us which GPU and drive you use for comparison?

Thanks


I would say that any GPU with over 100 cores is good. We have 8800 GT, and 9800 GX2. We want to support multiple GPUs not in SLI mode, I have not tested it yet.

A machine with a quad code cpu and 2 9800 GX2 would crunch more or less 20,000 credits/day.

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1226 - Posted: 16 Jul 2008 | 8:59:57 UTC - in response to Message 1217.

There are 7 users with failed workunits at startup.
It would be very useful to know what they are running (OS, GPU, driver version) in order to understand the problem.

REMEMBER THAT YOU NEED TO UPDATE THE BOINC CLIENT (6.3.5 ubuntu) FROM THE LINK THAT I HAVE GIVEN ABOVE. YOU CANNOT USE AN OLD ONE.

Many many thanks.

gdf



Users with old version of the client would not receive work now. They will have to update to version 6.3.5.

gdf

Temujin
Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 07
Posts: 100
Credit: 21,848,502
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1227 - Posted: 16 Jul 2008 | 9:11:52 UTC - in response to Message 1223.

Can you tell us which GPU and drive you use for comparison?

Hi

Fedora 7 64bit
Asus 8800GS
NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-169.09-pkg2.run

Temujin
Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 07
Posts: 100
Credit: 21,848,502
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1228 - Posted: 16 Jul 2008 | 11:37:36 UTC - in response to Message 1222.

Hi

My 1st GPU work unit completed just fine, the next 2 failed and the 4th is running now.
Also had a machine crash just after the 1st WU completed.
Results here

The 4th WU has just completed after 4 hours but failed validation with process exited with code 1 message in stderr out (same as the 2nd & 3rd WUs).

I've set No New Work for the moment.

Profile [XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ
Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 08
Posts: 60
Credit: 108,384
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
wat
Message 1229 - Posted: 16 Jul 2008 | 11:59:44 UTC - in response to Message 1227.


Fedora 7 64bit
Asus 8800GS
NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-169.09-pkg2.run


Thanks

I tested two drivers, 173.14 and 177.13, no difference

I will test 169.09 ... maybe


Temujin
Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 07
Posts: 100
Credit: 21,848,502
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1230 - Posted: 16 Jul 2008 | 12:50:51 UTC - in response to Message 1229.

I tested two drivers, 173.14 and 177.13, no difference

I initially had 173.14 installed (from here) but wasn't sure if that was a cuda driver or not
So followed the http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_get.html link and it suggested the 169.09 package for my setup.

Westsail and *Pyxey*
Send message
Joined: 12 Feb 08
Posts: 11
Credit: 3,194,461
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwatwat
Message 1235 - Posted: 17 Jul 2008 | 14:25:27 UTC

So what do you guys think? It appears my older Nvidia cards don't support CUDA. :(
Looking for a card to put in my dedicated cruncher for this project.
I think I have settled on this:

ZOTAC ZT-98XES2P-FSP GeForce 9800 GTX
____________

Profile Stefan Ledwina
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 16 Jul 07
Posts: 464
Credit: 135,911,881
RAC: 123
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1237 - Posted: 17 Jul 2008 | 14:38:36 UTC
Last modified: 17 Jul 2008 | 14:40:37 UTC

The 9800 GTX shouldn't be a bad cruncher, you can see the runtimes per WU of my card in the other thread you started...

But if you would like to, or are able to spend a little bit more money on the graphics card, one of the new GTX 260, or GTX 280 cards would be much faster!

But for a GTX 280, you would probably also need a new PSU, because it needs a 8pin plus a 6pin power connector - the GTX 260 only two 6 pin connectors...
____________

pixelicious.at - my little photoblog

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1239 - Posted: 17 Jul 2008 | 15:31:42 UTC - in response to Message 1237.
Last modified: 17 Jul 2008 | 15:32:04 UTC

The 9800 GTX shouldn't be a bad cruncher, you can see the runtimes per WU of my card in the other thread you started...

But if you would like to, or are able to spend a little bit more money on the graphics card, one of the new GTX 260, or GTX 280 cards would be much faster!

But for a GTX 280, you would probably also need a new PSU, because it needs a 8pin plus a 6pin power connector - the GTX 260 only two 6 pin connectors...



A way to know which card is better for the money do this: Compute the peak Gflops of the card.

Peak Gflops = (shader clock)x(number of stream processors)x(3 flop)

The highest the better.


GDF

Profile [XTBA>XTC] ZeuZ
Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 08
Posts: 60
Credit: 108,384
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
wat
Message 1241 - Posted: 17 Jul 2008 | 16:11:48 UTC - in response to Message 1239.


Peak Gflops = (shader clock)x(number of stream processors)x(3 flop)

The highest the better.
GDF


It's x2 flop I think

Westsail and *Pyxey*
Send message
Joined: 12 Feb 08
Posts: 11
Credit: 3,194,461
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwatwat
Message 1242 - Posted: 17 Jul 2008 | 16:30:03 UTC
Last modified: 17 Jul 2008 | 16:38:53 UTC

Thanks guys!
What I would like to know, is how CPU intensive is this? I am imagining the GPU is doing most the work. A core is tied up with it but not running 100% like we do with "traditional" projects.
So my conjecture/question is if the same RAC, with whatever card, can be achieved with a slightly slower (read cheaper) cpu?
I am very keen to see if it will be successful to run multiple tasks on multiple cards simultaneously.
If all my assumptions above are correct. Then rather than spend more to get a faster card, that ties up one of my good crunching cores.
Wouldn't it be cool to build a budget dedicated twin or even quad GPU cruncher?
I invision two of the $200 dollar cards. (although if one had the funds the GTX 280 is an amazing machine) A basic $50 atx board and a $50 processor, probably a 4200+. Using Stefan's numbers that would be like 8-10k RAC a day for the price of a PS3. Really exciting development you guys have here. I will do whatever I can to encourage this technology. And to think I thought the Cell BE was cool. ;)
____________

Profile Stefan Ledwina
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 16 Jul 07
Posts: 464
Credit: 135,911,881
RAC: 123
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1244 - Posted: 17 Jul 2008 | 16:56:34 UTC - in response to Message 1242.

Thanks guys!
What I would like to know, is how CPU intensive is this? I am imagining the GPU is doing most the work. A core is tied up with it but not running 100% like we do with "traditional" projects.


Actually the application uses also one core of the CPU to 100% plus the GPU as coprocessor...
I really can't say how important the CPU speed is for the GPU application, but earlier test have shown that if the app uses only 50% of a CPU core, the WUs were a good bit slower.

Would be interesting to see some comparisons with the same graphics cards but other CPUs in the thread you started...
____________

pixelicious.at - my little photoblog

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1245 - Posted: 17 Jul 2008 | 17:11:48 UTC - in response to Message 1244.
Last modified: 17 Jul 2008 | 17:17:16 UTC

Thanks guys!
What I would like to know, is how CPU intensive is this? I am imagining the GPU is doing most the work. A core is tied up with it but not running 100% like we do with "traditional" projects.


Actually the application uses also one core of the CPU to 100% plus the GPU as coprocessor...
I really can't say how important the CPU speed is for the GPU application, but earlier test have shown that if the app uses only 50% of a CPU core, the WUs were a good bit slower.

Would be interesting to see some comparisons with the same graphics cards but other CPUs in the thread you started...



The CPU is not important at all. It appears to be using 100% of resources just because it is polling waiting for the accelerated kernel to finish.
So, any CPU should do.

We have built a machine with 6 GPU cores by putting together 3 Geforce 9800 GX2, a power supply of 1200W, an Nvidia 780i motherboard with 3 PCI-E 16x slots and a quad core CPU.

We are looking into building another one with Geforce 280.

GDF

Profile Stefan Ledwina
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 16 Jul 07
Posts: 464
Credit: 135,911,881
RAC: 123
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1255 - Posted: 17 Jul 2008 | 20:15:56 UTC - in response to Message 1245.



The CPU is not important at all. It appears to be using 100% of resources just because it is polling waiting for the accelerated kernel to finish.
So, any CPU should do.

We have built a machine with 6 GPU cores by putting together 3 Geforce 9800 GX2, a power supply of 1200W, an Nvidia 780i motherboard with 3 PCI-E 16x slots and a quad core CPU.

We are looking into building another one with Geforce 280.

GDF


Wow! This sounds like a nice machine! :D
Want to give it away to me as a present? ;-)



____________

pixelicious.at - my little photoblog

MacDitch
Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 07
Posts: 1
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Level

Scientific publications
wat
Message 1258 - Posted: 18 Jul 2008 | 1:57:18 UTC - in response to Message 1244.

Actually the application uses also one core of the CPU to 100% plus the GPU as coprocessor...


Please excuse my ignorance, but does that mean the remaining cores are left free to do 'traditional' BOINC projects?

Profile PaladinRPG
Send message
Joined: 1 Apr 08
Posts: 2
Credit: 4,460,665
RAC: 0
Level
Ala
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1259 - Posted: 18 Jul 2008 | 6:20:27 UTC

Here's to hoping this can get ported to windows soon. I'd love to donate my new 8800 GT to the cause. :)

The "100%" resource use of one CPU core doesn't interfere with other traditional BOINC projects, does it?

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1260 - Posted: 18 Jul 2008 | 6:44:55 UTC - in response to Message 1258.

Actually the application uses also one core of the CPU to 100% plus the GPU as coprocessor...


Please excuse my ignorance, but does that mean the remaining cores are left free to do 'traditional' BOINC projects?



Yes, they are.

gdf

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1261 - Posted: 18 Jul 2008 | 6:47:15 UTC - in response to Message 1259.

Here's to hoping this can get ported to windows soon. I'd love to donate my new 8800 GT to the cause. :)

The "100%" resource use of one CPU core doesn't interfere with other traditional BOINC projects, does it?


No, it should not.

gdf

Profile Krunchin-Keith [USA]
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 17 May 07
Posts: 512
Credit: 111,288,061
RAC: 0
Level
Cys
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1267 - Posted: 18 Jul 2008 | 19:41:50 UTC - in response to Message 1245.

We have built a machine with 6 GPU cores by putting together 3 Geforce 9800 GX2, a power supply of 1200W, an Nvidia 780i motherboard with 3 PCI-E 16x slots and a quad core CPU.

GDF

Could your clarify this.

Does a GPU task use only 1 CPU core and all avaialable GPU cores, in this case 6, or does each gpu task use 1 cpu and 1 graphics card (2 gpu cores) or just 1 gpu core ?

So your rig above, how many gpu tasks could run at the same time to use all cores, and how many cpus would that use and how many cpus would be left for other boinc projects ?

Profile GDF
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 07
Posts: 1957
Credit: 629,356
RAC: 0
Level
Gly
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwat
Message 1270 - Posted: 19 Jul 2008 | 1:22:39 UTC - in response to Message 1267.

We have built a machine with 6 GPU cores by putting together 3 Geforce 9800 GX2, a power supply of 1200W, an Nvidia 780i motherboard with 3 PCI-E 16x slots and a quad core CPU.

GDF

Could your clarify this.

Does a GPU task use only 1 CPU core and all avaialable GPU cores, in this case 6, or does each gpu task use 1 cpu and 1 graphics card (2 gpu cores) or just 1 gpu core ?

So your rig above, how many gpu tasks could run at the same time to use all cores, and how many cpus would that use and how many cpus would be left for other boinc projects ?


This is tunable. At the moment we are using 1 CPU core for each GPU core. Regarding the machine, we are using it mainly outside BOINC.

gdf

Profile [FVG] bax
Avatar
Send message
Joined: 18 Jun 08
Posts: 29
Credit: 17,772,874
RAC: 0
Level
Pro
Scientific publications
watwatwatwatwatwat
Message 1272 - Posted: 19 Jul 2008 | 13:10:38 UTC - in response to Message 1210.

news ?


For Linux64:
1) Install the latest Nvidia driver.....
GDF


yes sir :-))

thx for your efforts ;-)

Post to thread

Message boards : Graphics cards (GPUs) : GPU grid??! Which GPU is supported?

//