Message boards : Number crunching : ETA on new non-beta WUs?
Author | Message |
---|---|
Sorry if this was addressed prior, but I recently started crunching again and was wondering if there is a mention of when we can expect non-beta WUs to return. The beta ones unfortunately failed for me when I tried it a month ago. Thanks | |
ID: 60873 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Unknown. | |
ID: 60874 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Ah damn that's a shame. I loved crunching for this project the most too. | |
ID: 60875 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Windows hosts have a very difficult time running the ATMbeta tasks it seems. | |
ID: 60876 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Windows hosts have a very difficult time running the ATMbeta tasks it seems. That's not always the case. Back in the spring, before switching to Linux, I was getting success rate of 90% plus, with Windows 10, which is about the same as Linux. I was and still am running the units two at a time. If one errors out, typically with the NAN error, the other finishes successfully. I don't remember my exact pagefile space size, but it was a pretty large number. Though, Linux does run faster. If they can fix all the bugs, that were discussed ad nauseam, this app would be great. | |
ID: 60877 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I was just posting the observation based on the number of forum complaints about the tasks not working on Windows hosts. | |
ID: 60878 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
I was just posting the observation based on the number of forum complaints about the tasks not working on Windows hosts. Good point, I'm just pointing out that there are exceptions to every rule. | |
ID: 60879 | Rating: 0 | rate: / Reply Quote | |
Message boards : Number crunching : ETA on new non-beta WUs?